Archive for February, 2024

Statement by the Medical Association of Alabama on the Recent Alabama Supreme Court Ruling on the Legal Status of Embryos

Statement by the Medical Association of Alabama on the Recent Alabama Supreme Court Ruling on the Legal Status of Embryos

The Medical Association of the State of Alabama expresses concern over the recent Alabama Supreme Court decision regarding the legal status of embryos, as it relates to In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) procedures that may result in a woman becoming pregnant. 

The significance of this decision impacts all Alabamians and will likely lead to fewer babies—children, grandchildren, nieces, nephews, and cousins—as fertility options become limited for those who want to have a family.

In addition, the ruling has already forced UAB, the largest healthcare system in the State of Alabama, to stop providing IVF services to Alabama couples. Others will likely do the same, leaving little to no alternatives for reproductive assistance. IVF is oftentimes the only option for couples wanting to conceive.

In closing, we ask that the Alabama Supreme Court stay or revisit their ruling to ensure continued access to IVF care in Alabama.

Posted in: Legal Watch, Official Statement

Leave a Comment (0) →

OCR Issues Guidance on Visitation Discrimination
in Hospitals and Long Term Care Facilities

OCR Issues Guidance on Visitation Discrimination<br>in Hospitals and Long Term Care Facilities

By: Angie C. Smith, Burr & Forman LLP

Visitation in long-term care facilities and hospitals received a lot of attention during COVID
because of facility closures that led to limited visitation, and it is now a topic of interest for the
Office of Civil Rights (OCR) due to discrimination concerns. On January 25, 2024, OCR issued
guidance to hospitals and long-term care facilities to clarify obligations of those providers to
ensure religious non-discrimination for patient visitation.

Under federal law, hospitals, long-term care facilities, and critical access hospitals are prohibited
from restricting, denying or in any way limiting visitation to patients on the basis of race, color,
national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability. Additionally,
provisions of the Affordable Care Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act prohibit any
type of discrimination in certain federally funded programs and activities. In order to be in
compliance, providers are required to have policies and procedures to prohibit discrimination. In
fact, when becoming a Medicare provider, healthcare providers certify to the federal
government that they are in compliance with these non-discrimination laws.
Although the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is the agency that oversees
compliance with the regulations cited above, CMS has delegated its authority to enforce the
regulations pertaining to discrimination in visitation to OCR. Following this delegation, OCR
issued a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to serve as guidance for hospitals and long-term care facilities. Additionally, OCR held a call with stakeholders on February 6, 2023, to
further discuss its guidance. Below are the key topics covered by OCR.

  1. What constitutes visitation?
    The FAQ states that patients and residents have the right to receive visitors of
    their choosing, but it also noted that patients and residents can withdraw or deny
    consent to any visitor. A visitor includes, but is not limited to, a spouse or
    domestic partner, same-sex spouse or domestic partner, another family member or
    friend, and clergy minister or other faith leader.
    The guidance also reminds providers of their obligations to allow individuals with
    disabilities access to support persons, which is separate and apart from an
    individual’s right to visitors.
  2. Which facilities are covered by the visitation requirements?
    The guidance specifically references the regulations pertaining to hospitals,
    including critical access hospitals, and long-term care facilities, but it also
    referenced federal non-discrimination laws that apply to all entities receiving
    federal funding. Those laws prohibit entities receiving federal assistance from
    excluding an individual from participating in, denying an individual the benefits
    of, or otherwise discriminating against an individual in the entity’s programs and
    activities. Therefore, even those providers who may not be covered by the
    visitation requirements should review the guidance.
  3. Which patients are covered by these rights?
    Patients and residents protected by the visitation rights are not limited to Medicare
    and Medicaid beneficiaries. All patients or residents receiving services from
    Medicare and Medicaid-certified facilities are covered by this guidance, and the
    right to visitation and non-discrimination applies to all patients and residents,
    regardless of whether their hospitalization or residency is being paid for by
    Medicare or Medicaid.
  4. What are the notification obligations of the facilities?
    Hospitals and long-term care facilities are required to inform patients and
    residents of their visitation rights, which should include any information related to
    clinical limitations or restrictions on such visitation. These providers must also
    have written policies and procedures related to visitation that include any
    clinically necessary or reasonable restriction or limitation that the provider may
    need to place on the visitation rights of a patient and the reasons that would
    support clinical restrictions or limitations.
    As mentioned above, OCR recognizes that there may be clinical reasons that
    visitation with a patient must be restricted or limited, and OCR’s FAQs make it
    clear that any such restriction or limitation must be “clinically necessary” or
    “otherwise reasonable.” Examples provided were limiting visitation hours or the
    number of visitors at a time. However, it is important that any type of limitation
    or restriction be objective and not based on any stereotype or assumption. It
    should also be clearly outlined in the facility’s policies related to visitation.
    OCR states in the FAQs that a provider has a responsibility to provide auxiliary
    aids and services to individuals with a disability in order to provide equal
    opportunity to participate or benefit from the services provided, which would
    include the ability to have visitation. According to the FAQs, a policy that only
    allows for video remote interpretation instead of in-person interpreter “may
    violate” certain non-discrimination laws, if an in-person interpreter or reader is
    necessary for effective communication.
  5. What might constitute a discriminatory denial of visitation?
    If a policy or procedure subjects certain classes of visitors to additional screening
    or if it prohibits certain classes of visitors and not others on the basis of race,
    color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, or
    disability. Examples given were as follows:
    1. Facility prevented family member from bringing patients kosher food or
      halal food to meet the patient’s religious dietary restrictions while
      allowing other visitors to bring non-religious food items to patients.
    2. Members of certain religious groups subjected to more rigorous screening
      or denied visitation.
    3. Policies that would prohibit clergy or religious leaders from meeting with the patient.
  1. Does a facility’s chaplain program affect the right to visitation by other faith
    leaders?
    Even if the facility has a chaplaincy program, it must still allow other types of religious or faith leaders to visit patients, if the patient requests such visitation. Likewise, a facility must abide by a patient’s choice to deny visitation to clergy or religious leaders.

Conclusion/Takeway
Typically, when OCR issues guidance on a particular topic, we see corresponding scrutiny from
regulators and government enforcement agencies. Therefore, providers should take this
opportunity to review its visitation policies for compliance with the guidance and ensure staff are
educated on those policies.

OCR’s FAQs can be found here.
https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/special-topics/emergency-preparedness/faqs- patient-visitation/index.html?cm_ven=ExactTarget&cm_cat=HHS+Office+for+Civil+Rights+Releases+ Visitation+Guidance+Resources&cm_pla=Mark%27s+Memos+2024+Marketing+List&cm_ite= FAQ+on+Patient+Visitation+at+Certain+Federally+Funded+Entities+and+Facilities%e2%80%8 b&cm_lm=1612414245&cm_ainfo=&&&&&


Angie Smith is a Partner at Burr & Forman LLP practicing exclusively in the Healthcare
Practice Group. Kelli may be reached at (205) 458-5209 or acsmith@burr.com.

Posted in: Legal Watch

Leave a Comment (0) →

Dr. Regina Benjamin: A Trailblazer in Medicine Honored with the Samuel Buford Word Award

Dr. Regina Benjamin: A Trailblazer in Medicine Honored with the Samuel Buford Word Award

In the realm of healthcare, the name Dr. Regina Benjamin resonates as a beacon of inspiration and change. As the first African American President of the Medical Association of the State of Alabama and the 18th Surgeon General of the United States, Dr. Benjamin’s illustrious career is marked by a profound commitment to service, advocacy, and addressing healthcare disparities. This year, she is set to be presented with the esteemed Samuel Buford Word Award at the Medical Association’s Annual Meeting.

Trailblazing Leadership

Dr. Regina Benjamin’s journey to becoming a trailblazer in the medical field began in Mobile, Alabama, where she was raised in an environment that valued community service and compassion. Her early exposure to the healthcare profession, through the stories of her grandfather’s dedicated service as a country doctor, ignited a passion that would shape her illustrious career.

After earning her medical degree from the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Dr. Benjamin returned to her hometown, establishing a clinic that catered to the needs of underserved communities. Her dedication to addressing healthcare disparities at the grassroots level earned her widespread recognition and paved the way for her ascent into leadership roles.

Surgeon General of the United States

In 2009, Dr. Regina Benjamin made history as the 18th Surgeon General of the United States, breaking barriers as the first African American woman to hold this prestigious position. During her tenure, Dr. Benjamin focused not only on traditional public health issues but also on the social determinants of health. Recognizing that health outcomes are influenced by factors beyond clinical care, she advocated for holistic approaches that addressed the root causes of disparities, including poverty, education, and access to essential resources.

Her leadership in the face of challenges, such as the H1N1 pandemic and the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, showcased her resilience and commitment to public health. Dr. Benjamin’s tenure as Surgeon General left an indelible mark, emphasizing the importance of preventive care, health promotion, and community engagement.

Samuel Buford Word Award: A Legacy of Service

This year, Dr. Regina Benjamin will be honored with the Samuel Buford Word Award at the Medical Association’s Annual Meeting. Established in 1971, the award is named in memory of Samuel Buford Word, M.D., a distinguished physician and former president of the Medical Association of the State of Alabama. The award recognizes individuals who have demonstrated exceptional service to humanity beyond the typical scope of medical practice, often at personal sacrifice.

As the highest honor presented by the Medical Association, the Word Award symbolizes a commitment to the values upheld by its namesake. Dr. Benjamin’s receipt of this award not only acknowledges her outstanding achievements in medicine but also underscores her profound dedication to service and the betterment of human health.

A Legacy of Service and Inspiration

Dr. Regina Benjamin’s journey from a community clinic in Mobile to the highest echelons of medical leadership is a testament to her unwavering commitment to service and advocacy. Her groundbreaking achievements have not only paved the way for future generations but have also significantly impacted the trajectory of healthcare in the United States.

As she prepares to receive the Samuel Buford Word Award, Dr. Benjamin’s legacy serves as a reminder that true leadership in medicine extends beyond clinical expertise—it encompasses a passion for equity, a commitment to service, and a tireless pursuit of a healthier and more just society. In honoring Dr. Regina Benjamin, the Medical Association celebrates not only an individual but a legacy that continues to inspire and shape the future of healthcare.

Posted in: Education, Health, Uncategorized

Leave a Comment (0) →