Archive for April, 2021

Medical Association Supports Continued Funding for Maternal Death Investigations

Medical Association Supports Continued Funding for Maternal Death Investigations

‘Shocking’ Nearly 70% of Deaths Are Preventable, Experts Say      

MONTGOMERY – The Medical Association of the State of Alabama today joined Alabama legislators in calling for continued state funding to investigate why Alabama mothers die from childbirth and pregnancy complications at more than double the rate of women nationally.

The funding for this research, which was first appropriated by Governor Kay Ivey and the Alabama Legislature just last year, enables the Alabama Maternal Mortality Review Committee (AL-MMRC) to pay for additional autopsies and costs associated with compiling case files and reviewing medical records of Alabama mothers who died up to a year after giving birth. While the AL-MMRC was launched in 2018, it relied solely on the work of volunteers to undertake such reviews until last year.

Appearing at a press conference in Montgomery today, Aruna Arora, MD, MPH, President of the Medical Association, applauded Senator Linda Coleman-Madison for sponsoring a resolution spotlighting the findings of the first AL-MMRC report and acknowledging continued funding of the program is critical to saving Alabama mothers.

“The recent report of the Maternal Mortality Review Committee was both shocking and informative,” said Dr. Arora. “That nearly 70 percent of the deaths could have possibly been prevented highlights the inequities of our current health system and underscores the need for the continued annual review to determine why these high numbers of deaths are occurring. Funding the review committee provides invaluable insight into the deaths of Alabama mothers and will enable the experts to develop specific strategies to save lives in the future.”

For its initial report, the AL-MMRC undertook a review of all maternal deaths in the state from 2016. Highlights from that report include:

  • 36 mothers lost their lives within one year of the end of pregnancy and 36 percent of those deaths were directly related to the pregnancy.
  • Nearly 70 percent of deaths were determined to be preventable.
  • Mental health and substance use disorders were identified as key contributors in almost 50 percent of deaths.
  • 67 percent of deaths occurred 43 to 365 days after the end of pregnancy.

Additionally, the AL-MMRC also made more than 100 recommendations to improve maternal health. Chief among those recommendations is for the state to expand Medicaid. 

“Right now, amid a global pandemic, affordable and accessible health care is more important than ever,” continued Dr. Arora. “Just last week, new research found the risk of maternal mortality to be 22 times higher in women who tested positive for COVID-19 during pregnancy. Thus, with other research showing reduced maternal mortality rates and positive maternal health outcomes in states that expanded Medicaid, the decision to expand here in Alabama is abundantly clear.”

The Medical Association appreciates Governor Ivey’s recommendation for initial funding for the review committee for 2020-21 as well as the continued efforts from legislative leaders like Senator Coleman-Madison, Rep. Laura Hall, and others.                                                                                 

The Medical Association also launched an online social media effort aimed at increasing awareness of maternal health needs with #SaveAlMoms and a website:  www.alabamamedicine.org/SaveAlMoms/.


Posted in: Advocacy, Members, Official Statement

Leave a Comment (0) →

Physician Recruitment Agreements – What You Need to Know

Physician Recruitment Agreements – What You Need to Know

by Howard E. Bogard

Both the federal Anti-kickback Statute and the Stark Law allow a hospital to provide certain financial assistance to aid a medical practice in its efforts to recruit and hire a new physician. Financial assistance can take many forms, including a collection guarantee, net income guarantee and/or payments with respect to a physician’s moving expenses, school debt and marketing.  A recruitment agreement reflecting financial assistance is typically signed by the medical practice, physician and hospital and is structured as a loan that is forgivable as long as the physician practices medicine in the hospital’s service area for a defined time period. The amount of financial assistance cannot take into account past or future referrals from the recruited physician (or medical practice) to the hospital.

In order for a hospital to provide a medical practice financial assistance to recruit and hire a new physician, the hospital must first determine that there is a documented need in the community for the physician’s specialty.  Once confirmed, the arrangement must be in writing and the physician must “relocate his or her medical practice” to the “geographic area served by the hospital” to become a member of the hospital’s medical staff. With some exceptions for hospitals located in rural areas, the geographic area served by a hospital is the area composed of the lowest number of contiguous zip codes from which the hospital draws at least 75 percent of its inpatients.  A physician will be considered to have relocated his or her medical practice if the physician moves his or her practice at least 25 miles and into the geographic area served by the hospital or the physician moves his or her practice into the geographic area served by the hospital and the physician derives at least 75 percent of revenues from patients not seen or treated by the physician at his or her prior medical practice site. There are also exceptions for residents or physicians who have been in practice one year or less or for physicians who meet other requirements.  The main point is that it is not permissible for a hospital to provide recruitment assistance with respect to a physician who is already working in the hospital’s service area.  

A common form of recruitment assistance is a collection or net income guarantee that runs for one or two years after the physician is first employed by the medical practice.   In either case, the recruitment agreement “guarantees” that the physician will generate a certain amount of revenue to satisfy a collection “target” or a net income “target”.  If the physician’s collections are not high enough in a particular month to meet the target amount, the hospital pays the difference.  With respect to a net income guarantee, the target is based on the physician’s collections after certain “direct expenses” are subtracted.  By law, direct expenses can only consist of new, incremental expenses incurred by the medical practice by virtue of the physician’s employment. Examples of new, direct expenses include the cost of the physician’s compensation and benefits, license fees and dues, malpractice insurance and other costs incurred by the medical practice to the extent that such expenses increase directly as a result of the physician’s employment.  Existing expenses, such as office rent and personnel costs, cannot be included as a direct expense. 

When reviewing a physician recruitment agreement, it is important to not only review the financial terms of the assistance but also to consider the following:

 Commitment Period – What is the length of time the recruited physician must practice in the hospital’s geographic service area for the recruitment assistance loan to be forgiven? The typical time period is one to three years after the financial assistance period ends.

   Repayment Obligations – It is important to review whether the medical practice, physician or both are obligated to repay the loan upon a default of the recruitment agreement.  Oftentimes, if the physician is the direct recipient of the loan proceeds, such as moving expense reimbursement and payments for student loans, the physician will be solely responsible. However, a collection or net income guarantee will often obligate both the physician and medical practice to repayment in the event of a default. A promissory note is often signed by the physician and sometimes the medical practice to secure the repayment of the loan.

Physician Obligations – While the physician will need to remain on the medical staff of the hospital during the term of the recruitment agreement, it is important to determine if other obligations are imposed on the physician.  Often, during the term of the recruitment agreement the physician will be obligated to certain hospital call obligations and restricted from having an ownership interest in a provider that competes with the hospital. 

Security Interest – To secure the recruitment agreement loan sometimes the hospital will want a security interest in the medical practice’s accounts receivable generated by the recruited physician. These provisions must be carefully reviewed since medical practices often pledge their accounts receivable as collateral to a bank or other financial institution.

A physician recruitment agreement can provide a medical practice significant financial assistance with the recruitment and hiring of a new physician. However, the agreement may also impose significant financial restrictions and penalties on both the medical practice and physician if the terms of the agreement are breached.  Any recruitment agreement should be carefully reviewed and negotiated.

Howard Bogard is a Partner at Burr & Forman LLP and chairs the firm’s Health Care Practice Group. He can be reached at 205-458-5416 or at hbogard@burr.com.

Posted in: Legal Watch, Management, Members, MVP

Leave a Comment (0) →

America’s ‘Other’ Health Emergency Needs Attention Too

America’s ‘Other’ Health Emergency Needs Attention Too

Drug overdose deaths could surpass 100,000 in the U.S. for the first time ever

By John Meigs, Jr., MD

For the past 12 months, the nation’s medical community correctly and understandably focused nearly all its attention on the COVID-19 pandemic.  Now with millions being vaccinated, we are hopefully about to turn the corner and can begin returning our focus to a different health crisis that never went away and actually got worse during COVID.

That crisis is the drug overdose crisis, the epidemic inside the pandemic.

Research shows that more than 13 percent of American adults started or increased substance use to cope with stress related to COVID-19.  Unfortunately, many of the socially isolating steps that were necessary to combat COVID-19 are the same conditions where substance abuse flourishes.  

In Alabama, Jefferson County alone saw drug overdose deaths increase by 25 percent in 2020 to their highest level ever.  This mirrors national data, with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reporting the highest number of fatal overdoses ever recorded in the U.S. in a single year in the 12-month period ending in May 2020.  It’s likely the U.S. will surpass 100,000 drug overdose deaths this year for the first time ever.

Fortunately, Alabama is working with the CDC and other states to take statistics like these and turn them into action that ultimately reduces overdose deaths.

Through the Overdose Data to Action program, Alabama is improving its collection of comprehensive and timely information on non-fatal and fatal overdoses.  This helps the state to monitor and understand emerging trends, then drive effective prevention and response solutions tailored to the needs of individuals and communities.

For example, before becoming part of the Overdose Data to Action initiative, Jefferson County received data on overdoses only once a year.  Now it has access to that important information within 24 hours.  With that data in hand, the Jefferson County Department of Health identifies overdose hotspots and mobilizes rapid response teams with physicians, addiction specialists and peer counselors to target recovery and prevention resources to those neighborhoods being hit hardest by drug overdoses.  Plans to replicate this model for other Alabama counties are being developed.

Timely, evidence-based information and collaboration are essential for success in preventing overdose deaths.  First responders, mental health providers, community organizations, public health leaders, medical personnel and others all bring resources and expertise to this effort.

Physicians in Alabama and across America are certainly part of this effort.  We’ve fought to pass legislation to reduce prescription drug abuse and diversion.  Thousands have accessed continuing medical education and other intensive courses on substance use disorders.  In fact, the Medical Association of the State of Alabama was one of the first in the nation to offer an opioid prescribing education course.  Since 2009, we have reached more than 5,000 prescribers with information on the safe prescribing of opioids.  Since 2018, the number of times health care professionals in Alabama have accessed the state’s Prescription Drug Monitoring Program has increased by more than 20 percent, and Alabama physicians have reduced their prescriptions of opioids by more than 34 percent since 2014.  

All these collaborative efforts and more are needed as our nation’s drug overdose crisis evolves into an even more complicated and dangerous epidemic, due primarily to the pervasiveness of fentanyl.

Overdose deaths involving prescription opioids have steadily declined, but overdose deaths related to illicitly manufactured fentanyl and related fentanyl analogs increased nationwide by more than 500 percent between 2015 and 2019, according to the CDC.

Fentanyl, a painkiller that is 100 times more powerful than morphine, is the number one cause of overdose deaths in the United States today.  So powerful and lethal is fentanyl that if you were to swallow, inhale or absorb just two milligrams of it through your skin, you would die.  To appreciate just how small two milligrams is, consider that the packet of sweetener you’ll find on most restaurant tables is about 1,000 milligrams.

When police in Brookwood recently seized two pounds of fentanyl during a traffic stop, the former U.S. attorney who said it was enough to kill nearly every resident of Jefferson County was not exaggerating.

For years, fentanyl has been mixed with illegal drugs like heroin.  Today, however, we are seeing more instances where fentanyl is pressed into counterfeit pills to resemble prescription opioids.  Such was the case in Muscle Shoals last year where police found pills that were being sold by a drug dealer as Oxycodone but were actually pure fentanyl.  This takes the drug overdose crisis to a new and more dangerous level.  Everyone who obtains any drug from an illicit source should know they are at tremendous risk of a fatal fentanyl overdose. 

With the number of new COVID cases and deaths finally heading in the right direction, we must renew our attention and focus on America’s “other” health emergency, the overdose epidemic.  Significant efforts by health professionals, advocates, law enforcement and government are being made to address this crisis.  With even more attention, collaboration and resources, countless lives can be saved.

###

Dr. Meigs has practiced family medicine in Bibb County for more than 30 years and serves as President of the Medical Association of the State of Alabama.

Posted in: Leadership, Opioid

Leave a Comment (0) →