Posts Tagged cash

Four Dangerous Words Physicians Regularly Say

Four Dangerous Words Physicians Regularly Say

One trend evident in all medical practices is the shift in payment responsibility from insurance payers to the insured patients. As employers modify coverage to contain their premium costs, health care providers are treating patients who have $2,500, $5,000 and even $10,000 deductibles. Physicians who have practiced for many years have instructed their collections staff with the phrase “take what insurance pays.” This brief instruction was understandable when the patient portion of the treatment was only a co-pay of $25. The additional charge to the patient’s insurance made it acceptable to extend professional courtesy to many patients. In the era of paper charts, physicians even developed a shorthand note of “TWIP” for this common habit. In the modern era of high deductibles, this habit, if not broken, will cause serious damage to the cash flow of a practice in three ways.

Decline in Cash Flow

The most immediate impact is a decline in cash flow, and since these patient payment dollars can be seen as the last dollars of revenue, the impact on physician income will be dramatic. A practice which formerly collected $1,000,000 but loses 10 percent from failure to collect patient payments will suffer a 20-percent or more decline in physician income. If practice overhead costs 55 percent of collections, there would have been $450,000 left for salaries, fringe benefits and bonuses to the doctors. If collections decline by $100,000, for continued write off of patient payments, the doctor income drops to $350,000 — a 22-percent reduction. This is an example of how daily habits can produce bad cumulative outcomes.

Staff Discouragement

In addition to this drop in profits, the extension of professional kindness can diminish the collection enthusiasm among collections staff. Physicians are quick to instruct staff to extend special dispensation to patients who are friends or socially connected to the doctor. Collections staff members tell us that the doctor refused to let them collect from people who attend the same church as the physician, share a membership in a country club or social organization with the physician or have children who share activities with the physician’s family. When this group, which most likely has the greatest capability to pay for medical care, is excused from responsibility, the collections team is no longer as enthusiastic about collecting from the patients who have no social connection to the doctor. This additional loss of revenue is never known but can be significant.

Training Patients

Finally, affording patients the discretion to pay or not fosters an environment in which the patients are more inclined to take the medical practice for granted. In working with our medical practice clients at Warren Averett, we typically see that the patients who do not pay for their portion of care are also the ones inclined to not show up for appointments, not follow clinical directions and to treat medical staff rudely. These are the patients we recommend be terminated, when possible, in their treatment. To indiscriminately extend professional courtesy regarding patient financial responsibility is cultivating a problem which could have been staunched by simply collecting what the insurance contract stipulated to begin with.

The four words “take what insurance pays” seem benign at first but can be lethal if used unchecked.

Article contributed by Sae Evans, Maddox Casey and Jim Stroud, Members, Warren Averett Healthcare Consulting Group. Warren Averett is an official Gold Partner with the Medical Association.

Posted in: Insurance

Leave a Comment (0) →

CMS Issues More Protections to Physicians from Health Plan Credit Card Fees

CMS Issues More Protections to Physicians from Health Plan Credit Card Fees

In 2016 the Medical Association passed legislation to prevent physicians from unknowingly accepting virtual credit cards (VCC) and their hidden fees as a form of payment from health insurance companies and RCOs, even though the Medicaid RCO system in Alabama now appears to be defunct. Now, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has given notice that health plans cannot require physician practices or other health care organizations to accept payments made using so-called VCCs that are often accompanied by exorbitant service fees.

Once the Automated Clearing House (ACH) EFT standard went into effect in 2014, the Medical Association joined with other medical groups to advocate that CMS issue guidance spelling out physician rights regarding insurance company electronic payments, even passing legislation in Alabama. CMS has now posted the requested clarification of its EFT operating rules and standards on its HIPAA Administrative Simplification frequently asked questions webpage.

Unfortunately, not all private insurers followed the letter or spirit of the regulations and some insisted on making payments with VCCs, a 16-digit number emailed, faxed or mailed to a provider in order to make a one-time payment. In Alabama, all health insurers and RCOs must make physicians aware of their contracts of a physicians’ right to request payment via flat-fee “direct deposit” methods over VCCs, which charge a percentage-of-claims-based fee. The new law requires that all such physician requests for payment preference be honored.

Physicians accepting VCCs are losing a percentage of their contracted rate for any claims paid via this method. The fees may be as high as 5 percent of the total payment amount and health insurers paying claims with VCCs often receive cash back (up to 1.75 percent) or other incentives. The bank or credit card company issuing the VCC is also paid for use of their card network. In other words, unknown to many physicians and their staff responsible for claims and billing, insurers and credit card companies are indirectly charging up to 5 percent of a claim for processing the transfer of money via VCC. In some practices, these fees may add up to substantial sums – and the charges are hidden.

According to CMS: “A health plan cannot require a provider to accept virtual credit card payments. A provider has the right to request that a health plan use the electronic funds transfer (EFT) transaction. If a provider makes the request, the health plan must comply.”

Health insurance companies and RCOs place language into all their contracts with physicians outlining that a physician’s request to be paid with an ACH EFT (electronic funds transfer) must be honored.  Under HIPAA, payments made via the Automated Clearing House may only be a nominal flat fee – for instance, $0.34 instead of the 5 percent attached to some VCCs. The required language for all contracts, which must be in all caps, bolded 12-point font and offset from other language, reads as follows: “If a covered health care provider requests payment under a health insurance plan from a health insurer or its contracted vendor or a regional care organization be made using ACH electronic funds transfer, that request must be honored. Furthermore, such a request may not be used to delay or reject a transaction, or attempt to adversely affect the covered health provider.”

Although the Medical Association was successful in getting the law changed in Alabama to ensure physicians are notified in their contracts of their right to be paid with ACH EFT payments over VCCs, physicians and practices must individually decide whether or not they want to consent to the percentage-based fees associated with acceptance of VCCs. Additionally, because the Medical Association successfully included specific language be placed in each contract that the health insurer cannot delay or deny a transaction because of the choice of electronic funds transfer, each physician and practice should look for hidden “value-added” services. For instance, some ACH vendors have attempted to charge a higher fee for providing access to a 24-hour hotline. Under existing law, physicians are not required to enroll in such “value-added” programs.

Posted in: CMS

Leave a Comment (0) →