Archive for June, 2017

AMA Adopts Policy Aimed to Bolster Transparency of Prescription Costs

AMA Adopts Policy Aimed to Bolster Transparency of Prescription Costs

CHICAGO – As prescription drug prices have spiked – often without reason – the American Medical Association has advocated for more transparency in pricing to protect patients. At its Annual Meeting, the AMA adopted several policies, including policies on direct-to-consumer ads and naloxone pricing that aim to give patients more information about drugs prescribed to them and shed light on the rationale for price increases.

“Taken together, these policies would bring much-needed transparency to drug pricing and provide a clear benefit to consumers struggling with exorbitant costs. There seems to be no logic – or warning – to these price spikes. In the case of naloxone, communities are struggling to afford a life-saving treatment. Sunlight is needed to help respond to price shifts because if the pricing trends continue, patients and communities will not be able to afford life-saving drugs,” said AMA President-elect Barbara L. McAneny, M.D.

One policy adopted calls on manufacturers to list the suggested retail prices of drugs when running direct-to-consumer ads. The AMA will urge the appropriate federal agencies to include that requirement. One study showed that prescriptions medications that were advertised directly to consumers saw an increase in prices by 34.2 percent compared to a 5.1-percent increase in other pharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutical companies know their advertising pays off by having patients pressure physicians to prescribe certain medications that cost more than lower-cost alternatives and are not necessarily as efficacious. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals was illegal in the United States until 1997 and is currently legal in only one other country, New Zealand.

The delegates also took aim at the sudden increase in the cost of naloxone, the life-saving drug used to reverse the effects of opioid overdose. Community groups, schools, first responders and local governments rely on naloxone to save lives every day but are finding it increasingly costly. The AMA will raise awareness of the troubling conduct of the three manufacturers of naloxone that enlisted the assistance of physician, community groups, and elected officials to raise awareness and coverage of naloxone only to precipitously and inexplicably dramatically increase prices as soon as public policy changed to increase access. The AMA also will support legislative, regulatory and national advocacy efforts to increase access to affordable naloxone.

Finally, for patients and physicians to get a handle on skyrocketing prescription prices, the delegates called on drug companies to give public notice before increasing the price of certain drugs by more than 10 percent during a 12-month period. This would generate information about the most egregious examples of price gouging, particularly for older drugs.

The AMA has been fighting for price transparency for drugs and created the website www.TruthInRx.org to hear from patients and their struggles to afford prescriptions. TruthInRx.org is an interactive site that gives consumers an opportunity to tell their stories of how rising prices are affecting their health and their pocketbooks. The site is home to a growing gallery of curated videos and testimonials. It gives supporters ways to take action, such as sending a message to Congress and sharing content within their social networks.

Posted in: Advocacy

Leave a Comment (0) →

A Refresher in the Medicare Claims Appeals Process…

A Refresher in the Medicare Claims Appeals Process…

With the increased audit activity we are seeing among the alphabet soup of Medicare contractors – RACs, ZPICs, SMRCs, CERTs, etc. – now appears to be a good time for a refresher on the Medicare claims appeals process. Due to this increased audit activity, more and more claims are being denied, both under pre-payment review and post-payment review. This article provides an overview on the Medicare claims appeals process, as well as some tips and pointers to keep in mind.

Request for Redetermination

A request for redetermination, the first level of appeal, must be filed within 120 days of receipt of a demand letter from the Medicare carrier (or, if no demand letter is received, within 120 days from the date a Medicare remittance advice shows a claim denial). If the request for redetermination is filed within the shorter time frame of 30 days, recoupment will not be initiated. If the request for redetermination is filed after the 30-day period, recoupment may be initiated, but will be stopped once the appeal has been filed. Interest begins to accrue on the 31st day and continues to accrue, even if an appeal is filed, until the overpayment is repaid or an entirely favorable decision is rendered. Thus, the only way to avoid the accrual of interest completely is to repay the overpayment before the 31st day. However, you still retain appeal rights even if the alleged overpayment has been repaid — you just have to go through the hassle of trying to get the money back from Medicare if a favorable decision is eventually rendered.
To ensure that all the relevant information is included, send a cover letter containing your arguments (with supporting documentation), as well as the request for redetermination form available at https://www.cahabagba.com/part-b/claims-2/appeals-2-2/.

The first level of appeal is reviewed by the applicable Medicare carrier, which for physicians practicing in Alabama is Cahaba GBA. The Medicare carrier has 60 days to render a decision.

Request for Reconsideration

A request for reconsideration, the second level of appeal, must be filed within 180 days of receipt of a decision by the Medicare carrier on
the request for redetermination filing. If the request for reconsideration is filed within the shorter time frame of 60 days, recoupment will not be initiated. If the request for reconsideration is filed after the 60-day period, recoupment may be initiated, but will be stopped once the appeal has been filed. Interest will continue to accrue, even if an appeal is filed, until the overpayment is repaid or an entirely favorable decision is rendered. Importantly, all information must be presented at the request for reconsideration level of appeal, as new information is generally not allowed to be presented at the following levels of appeal.

To ensure that all the relevant information is included, send a cover letter containing your arguments (with supporting documentation), as well as the request for reconsideration form available at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/CMS-Forms/CMS-Forms/Downloads/CMS20033.pdf.

The second level of appeal is reviewed by the applicable Qualified Independent Contractor (“QIC”), an independent party hired by Medicare to review second level appeals. The QIC has 60 days to render a decision.

Administrative Law Judge

A request for a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), the third level of appeal, must be filed within 60 days of receipt of a decision by the QIC on the request for reconsideration, assuming the monetary thresholds are satisfied. Importantly, there is no opportunity to stop recoupment at this level of appeal. Thus, recoupment will begin and will continue until a favorable decision is rendered or until the full amount of the overpayment and accrued interest has been offset. Interest will continue to accrue at this level of appeal until the overpayment is repaid, offset through recoupment, or an entirely favorable decision is rendered.

To ensure that all the relevant information is included, utilize the ALJ hearing request form available at https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/omha/filing-an-appeal/coverage-and-claims-appeals/request-an-alj-hearing/index.html.

The ALJ hearing is usually conducted by telephone or video conference. By regulation, the hearing is supposed to take place and a decision rendered within 90 days of the appeal request. However, due to backlogs at the ALJ level, it is currently estimated that appeals will not be heard by ALJs for approximately 6-8 years, unless there is Congressional action to resolve the backlog. There is an option to escalate the appeal to the next level if a decision is not rendered timely in light of this delay. However, the success rate for providers at the ALJ level is relatively high, so bypassing this level of review is not always in the provider’s best interest. Nonetheless, despite the delay by the ALJ office, recoupment will continue.

Medicare Appeals Council

A request for review by the Medicare Appeals Council (“MAC”), the forth level of appeal, must be filed within 60 days of receipt of a decision from the ALJ, assuming the monetary threshold is satisfied. The MAC is supposed to render a decision within 90 days. However, due to backlogs, MAC decisions are also taking longer to be issued. There is an option to escalate the appeal to the next level if a decision is not rendered timely. However, such escalation is not always in the best interests of providers.

Judicial Review

A request for judicial review by the appropriate federal district court must be filed within 60 days from receipt of the MAC decision, assuming the monetary threshold is satisfied. From this point, the judicial system will oversee the proceeding.

A couple of points to keep in mind with respect to Medicare claims appeals. Be proactive – review the RAC website for approved audit issues, as well as the most-recent OIG Work Plan for target issues. Develop a formal intake and review process for records requests and demand letters. Always respond to records requests in a timely manner, as the failure to do so will result in an automatic claim denial. Keep track of denied claims and look for patterns. Determine corrective action to take, if applicable, and appeal as necessary and appropriate. If you appeal, file everything by a trackable delivery method and keep copies of all documents that are filed and received. Always ask for confirmation in writing when receiving advice or instruction from the applicable review body.

While the claims appeal process can be frustrating, time-consuming, and costly, providers tend to have a high degree of success. However, many providers simply pay the overpayment amount without challenging the finding due to the associated time and expense. Depending on the amount of the overpayment and the frequency with which you believe the pertinent issue has occurred within your practice, spending the time and effort to appeal may be beneficial.

Article contributed by Kelli Fleming, a partner at Burr & Forman LLP and practices exclusively in the Birmingham office within the Health Care Industry Group. Burr & Forman, LLP is a Bronze Partner with the Medical Association.

Posted in: Medicare

Leave a Comment (0) →

Today is National Call Your Doctor Day!

Today is National Call Your Doctor Day!

Today is the day a woman can do one thing for herself that will take less time than tying her shoes…call your doctor and schedule your annual wellness exam. Today is National Call Your Doctor Day!

Making this day halfway through the year holds significance because so many women delay their routine care. Often placing the priorities of work, family members or other obligations before their health, women overlook the simple phone call that may save their life.

According to a 2015 survey by ZocDoc, 80 percent of Americans delay or forgo preventative care. The number increases to 93 percent when surveying Millennials.

National Call Your Doctor Day can set an example for other women, help establish a baseline for many health concerns later in life, and improve opportunities for identifying risk factors. By making the appointment and keeping it, you place a priority on staying healthy so you can continue to meet those important obligations in the future. It only takes a few minutes to commit to this one annual exam. You know people who have made more binding commitments in less time. This is one appointment you will want to keep and mark on the calendar again next year.

There may be an even quicker way to make the appointment than picking up the phone when you have an established a relationship with a physician. With many clinics, you can set up an appointment online, quickly and securely.

Call your doctor and make an appointment for a Well-Woman Exam. Encourage your friends and family to do the same by using #CallYourDoctorDay to share on social media.

Posted in: Health

Leave a Comment (0) →

Law Allows Alabama Students to Apply Sunscreen at School

Law Allows Alabama Students to Apply Sunscreen at School

A new law allows Alabama school students to apply personal sunscreen at school without the need for special permission from a doctor or parent. The law includes public and private schools and went into effect immediately.

“Students will now be able to apply sunscreen to protect themselves from sunburn before going outside. We know that sunburn, particularly in childhood, increases your risk of skin cancer. Applying sunscreen before outside school activities will prevent overexposure to the sun’s UVA and UVB rays, thus preventing many forms of skin cancer, including melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer,” Dr. Tom Miller, State Health Officer at the Alabama Department of Public Health, said.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, application of sunscreen while outdoors is a simple step to protect yourself from the harm of overexposure to sunlight’s UVA and UVB rays. A sunscreen with an SPF of 30 or higher should be applied at least every two hours, especially after swimming or sweating. For parents with babies less than 6 months old, please follow directions on the sunscreen’s package for its use.

Aside from sunscreen, other steps to protection from the sun’s harmful UV rays include the following:

  • Avoiding use of sunbathing and tanning beds
  • Covering up with protective clothing and wide-brimmed hats
  • Seeking shade, especially during midday hours (between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m.)

Previously, students were unable to use sunscreen unless prescribed by a physician. With the passage of this law, no rules of the State Board of Education or the Alabama Board of Nursing will apply to Food and Drug Administration-approved over-the-counter sunscreen.

Melanoma is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the U.S. and is responsible for about 78 percent of all skin cancer deaths. Melanoma occurs when the pigment-producing cells that give color to the skin become cancerous. Cases of melanoma are 6 percent higher in Alabama than the national average. It is the most common type of skin cancer in children.

Alabama is among a growing number of states — like Arizona, California, New York, Oregon, Texas, Utah and Washington State — that lawfully permit students’ use of sunscreen at school.

For more information about sun safety, visit http://www.adph.org/skincancer/ or https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/skin/.

Posted in: Health

Leave a Comment (0) →

Match Day 2017 Successful for Alabama’s Medical Students

Match Day 2017 Successful for Alabama’s Medical Students

MOBILE — The excitement was thick in the ballroom of the Arthur R. Outlaw Mobile Convention Center on in March for Match Day. What is perhaps the most important day for each graduating medical school student can also be the most stressful. This day serves as a focus of celebration for medical schools and students nationwide – the day medical students learn the locations of the residency programs in which they will continue the next phase of their medical training.

Match Day is the result of medical students nationwide interviewing with different residency programs and ranking their top-choice programs in order of preference with the training programs doing the same. The National Residency Matching Program uses a mathematical algorithm to designate each applicant to a residency program.

Each student receives their sealed match letter at promptly 10:45 a.m. (CT). At 11 a.m., the students rip open their letters to learn the location of their residency program. It is truly a day of well-earned pageantry.

“Match Day is the most important day in a medical student’s career,” said Dr. Susan LeDoux, associate dean of medical education and student affairs at the University of South Alabama. “They work so hard to get into the specialty they like, and once they are in that specialty they continue to work hard throughout their training.”

According to USA, of the 70 College of Medicine seniors, 22 students went to Alabama medical institutions, including 12 who will do their residencies at USA hospitals. Forty-eight others, or 69 percent, drew out-of-state residencies in a total of 22 other states.

The University of Alabama-Birmingham also had impressive results. UAB’s match rate was 98 percent, or 173 students, from its School of Medicine seniors. Its students matched in 75 institutions in 29 states.

The inaugural class of the Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine in Dothan experienced its first Match Day this year with outstanding results as well. ACOM students achieved positions in 15 disciplines, 97 unique institutions/programs, and 29 states.

According to NRMP, the 2017 Match Day was the largest on record with 35,969 U.S. and international students and graduates vying for 31,757 positions – the most ever offered during a match.

“The number of U.S. allopathic seniors who submitted program choices is an all-time high. The number of students/graduates of osteopathic medical schools who submitted program choices, as well as their match rate, are all-time highs,” said Mona M. Signer, NRMP president and CEO. “It’s also a good sign for primary care.”

National Match by the Numbers

  • Internal Medicine, Family Medicine and Pediatrics added a combined 2,900 positions, a 25.8 percent increase
  • Emergency Medicine offered 2,047 first-year positions, 152 more than in 2016, and filled all but six
  • Psychiatry offered 1,495 first-year positions, 111 more than in 2016, and filled all but four
  • Specialties with more than 30 positions that achieved the highest percentages of positions filled by U.S. allopathic seniors, were Integrated Plastic Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery and Otolaryngology
  • Applicants who did not match participated in the NRMP Match Week Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program®. This year, 1,177 of the 1,279 unfilled positions were offered during SOAP.

*Special thanks to University of South Alabama College of Medicine, University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine and the Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine in Dothan for participating in this article. Photo courtesy of Bill Starling, photographer with USA.

Posted in: Members

Leave a Comment (0) →

What is the ProAssurance Legal Defense Endorsement?

What is the ProAssurance Legal Defense Endorsement?

As a ProAssurance insured, did you know that in addition to medical professional liability coverage your ProAssurance insurance policy also has embedded legal expense coverage for a variety of regulatory risk exposures, certain types of disciplinary proceedings, and other types of covered investigations? It’s called the Legal Defense Endorsement, and it is an automatic part of your policy at no additional cost to you. Generally speaking – and subject to applicable deductibles, policy period aggregates, and other terms and conditions – the Legal Defense Endorsement provides up to $25,000 of legal expense coverage on a per claim basis for a laundry list of “covered investigations” specifically listed in the endorsement.*

Many of the covered investigations are of the regulatory risk variety – like HIPAA, EMTALA, the federal Anti-Kickback and False Claims Act statutes, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and others. In the event of an investigation or proceeding commenced against you by a governmental or regulatory agency charged with the enforcement of compliance with those laws and regulations, call ProAssurance because your Legal Defense Endorsement could provide up to $25,000 of legal expense coverage to help you navigate the investigative process.

Several other covered investigations relate specifically to Medicare and Medicaid. Again, in the event of an investigation or proceeding commenced against you by any federal or state agency charged with the enforcement of compliance with certain laws regulating Medicare or Medicaid and the rules and regulations related to billing and reimbursement for medical services under those programs, your Legal Defense Endorsement could provide up to $25,000 of coverage for legal expenses you incur as a result of such investigations.

Some of the remaining covered investigations include disciplinary proceedings commenced by the state’s medical licensure commission investigating alleged unprofessional conduct that could result in action being taken against your license to practice medicine. Disciplinary proceedings commenced by a hospital or its medical staff for the purpose of suspending, modifying, restricting, revoking, non-renewing, or terminating your staff privileges are also covered investigations under your Legal Defense Endorsement. Many an unwitting physician has tried to represent him or herself in these types of proceedings, only to later regret not enlisting the assistance of legal counsel.

There are additional covered investigations in the Legal Defense Endorsement not mentioned in this article. If you want to read your Legal Defense Endorsement look for the form titled “Professional Legal Defense Coverage Part” in your current ProAssurance policy. The endorsement itself is about two-and-a-half pages. You can always access your policy documents online through the ProAssurance secure customer portal at www.proassurance.com.

Knowing and understanding how the coverage in your Legal Defense Endorsement works can help you to avoid spending money out of your own pocket on legal expenses that could be covered by the endorsement. More importantly, taking advantage of the coverage in your Legal Defense Endorsement can help you to avoid digging yourself into a deeper hole by attempting to handle a covered investigation on your own without the assistance of legal counsel.

For more information about your Legal Defense Endorsement or if you have questions about the coverage in the endorsement, contact your ProAssurance representative for assistance.

*Please note that legal counsel must be either appointed directly by ProAssurance or if selected by the insured, appointed by ProAssurance with prior written approval before their legal expenses can be covered under the Legal Defense Endorsement.

Posted in: Liability

Leave a Comment (0) →

House of Delegates Pass Policy Opposing Further Imposition of MOC

House of Delegates Pass Policy Opposing Further Imposition of MOC

During Annual Session, the Medical Association’s House of Delegates passed a resolution formally opposing additional Maintenance of Certification requirements as dictated by the American Board of Medical Specialties and the American Osteopathic Association. While it was agreed that the need for continuing medical education to improve the quality of care, the expense and clinically irrelevant process of MOC often proved overly burdensome.

MOC is designed to show that once a physician’s formal training is over, they are continuing to practice lifelong learning by continuing to challenge themselves to keep up with the latest developments in their chosen field. However, while physicians do support efforts to improve the quality of care of their patients, physicians have argued for years that MOC is overly expensive and often clinically irrelevant to everyday practice.

For example, the American Board of Internal Medicine has long required internists to pass Maintenance of Certification exams every 10 years to keep their board-certified status. However, this policy has recently come under scrutiny due to its high burden to doctors and the lack of sound evidence that recertification processes improve doctors’ quality of care. The ABIM announced it would offer a new assessment option starting in January 2018, allowing doctors to be recertified through shorter, but more frequent, assessments. But it’s not clear that this will make much difference.

To alleviate some burden on our physicians, the Medical Association’s Counsel on Medical Services studied the need for MOC and presented a formal resolution to the House of Delegates during Annual Session in April. The resolution, which passed, created a formal policy to oppose adding any further requirements for MOC as a condition of licensure, reimbursement, employment or admitting privileges at a hospital.

Posted in: Advocacy

Leave a Comment (0) →

Would You Like to Comment on Proposed Changes to the EHR Incentive Programs?

Would You Like to Comment on Proposed Changes to the EHR Incentive Programs?

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services would like to hear from you on the FY 2018 Inpatient Prospective Payment System and Long Term Acute Care Hospital Proposed Rule by June 13, 2017.

Click here to read the FY 2018 Inpatient Prospective Payment System and Long Term Acute Care Hospital Proposed Rule.

Submit a Formal Comment by 5:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, June 13

The public can submit comments in several ways:

  • By electronic submission through the “submit a formal comment” instructions on the Federal Register
  • By regular mail
  • By express or overnight mail
  • By hand or courier

The proposed rule includes potential changes to the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs, including:

  • For CY 2018, modifying the EHR reporting period from the full calendar year to a minimum of any continuous 90-day period for new and returning participants in the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive programs.
  • Adding a new exception from the Medicare payment adjustments for Eligible Professionals (EPs), Eligible Hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals that demonstrate through an application process that complying with the requirement for being a meaningful EHR user is not possible if ONC’s Health IT Certification Program has decertified their certified EHR technology.
  • Implementing a policy in which no payment adjustments will be made for EPs who furnish “substantially all” of their covered professional services in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC); applicable for the 2017 and 2018 Medicare payment adjustments.
  • Using Place of Service (POS) code 24 to identify services furnished in an ASC as well as requesting public comment on whether other POS codes or mechanisms should be used to identify sites of service in addition to or in lieu of POS code 24.

To learn more, review the proposed rule and visit the CMS website.

Posted in: CMS

Leave a Comment (0) →

Always Do Something You Enjoy with Suzanne Blaylock, M.D.

Always Do Something You Enjoy with Suzanne Blaylock, M.D.

TUSCUMBIA – When you walk into Dr. Suzanne Blaylock’s office at the Helen Keller Pavilion, there’s a medical journal on her desk, paused and waiting for her to return to continue reading the most recent article. On the wall behind her chair are framed reminders of why she choose anesthesiology as her specialty – awards recognizing her from the Peer Reviewed Professionals, the Consumers’ Research Council of America as one of America’s Top Anesthesiologists, and the Consumers’ Research Council of America’s Top Physicians. Dr. Blaylock always knew she’d have a career in medicine, but what she got was so much more.

“I started out in the medical field as a nurse,” Dr. Blaylock explained. “My father had taken nursing courses back in his day, but it wasn’t for him. He suggested I take the courses and he’d pay for them. I knew I wanted to do something in the sciences because I’ve always felt I had that mindset for it.”

After getting her Associate’s degree in Chattanooga, she moved to Birmingham and worked at Carraway Hospital. She started working toward her Bachelor’s degree when someone suggested the idea of a career in anesthesia. It wasn’t long before she realized that maybe a turn toward medical school would be a better choice.

“I really liked working in anesthesia, I mean, that was definitely the specialty I wanted to work in. But back then, as an anesthesia nurse, there was no real way to move up other than to become a doctor. So, I went back to UAB and started taking night classes,” Dr. Blaylock said.

Her experience as a nurse was definitely a valuable one, especially in the hospital setting as a medical student. Procedures, terminology and the day-to-day operation of a hospital were easier for her with her background and helped provide a better direction through medical school, she said. And, she continues to draw on those experiences even now when students from the state’s medical schools come to work with her and her colleagues.

“We get students from ACOM to come up and work with us, and that’s really good experience but not just for them. We enjoy getting to work with our students, because it gives all of us a chance to express ourselves in what we do every day, plus everyone gets a learning opportunity. Not only do these students learn from us, but surprisingly, there are some things we can learn from them. All the medical schools here in this state are just superb, but I think the students get a great perspective when they visit rural areas like Tuscumbia that are either on the cusp of revitalization or trying to expand to help their residents,” Dr. Blaylock said.

As settled in as she may be into the Tuscumbia area, one might easily take Dr. Blaylock for a small town girl. You’d be absolutely correct. Originally from a small town just outside of Chattanooga, her small town roots run deep…and so do her stories of home.

“My mother was a baker, and she worked at Little Debbie in Chattanooga. In fact, I went to school with Little Debbie, and I worked there, too!” she laughed. “Mom used to hand roll those cakes in the bakery. I worked in the micro lab. The first course I took right out of high school was microbiology, and there was a microbiology lab right there in the bakery. Little Debbie was really very innovative for its time. All the ingredients were tested for things like salmonella or mold counts on the chocolate, and then we’d go out and test the finished cookies. I’m sure companies do this now, but back then no one else did. The thing about Little Debbie – that finished product never had a germ on it!”

So, working in the best little bakery in the South right out of high school was probably the most amazing job in the world for a teenager, right? Absolutely! Dr. Blaylock said it was a dream job, but it probably contributed to her weight problem that followed her through her adult years. Like many medical professionals, eating a balanced diet may be with the best of intentions, but it may not always be what happens during the day.

“I had gotten out of shape, and I had always struggled with my weight. You try to diet, but you stop and start and stop and start, and then you just feel desperate because nothing is working. So a friend asked me to go to Weight Watchers with her. I thought I could just do this now, or I’m not going to do it at all. We had a dynamic leader, and my friend and I did it on the buddy system. Then it became more of a habit than a chore. Unfortunately for us in the medical field, we tend to eat prophylactically. It’s like, ‘I’d better eat now because I don’t know when I’ll get another chance!’” she laughed. “I ended up losing over a hundred pounds, but I didn’t keep it all off because now I have more muscle. I started working out more at the gym. I guess I must be highly suggestable because a friend at the gym suggested I do some triathlons. And then my coach suggested I try body building.”

Yes, body building, which Dr. Blaylock calls “a good hobby and a good stress reliever.” In fact, last year she became the 2016 National Physique Committee Masters Over 60 Figure Champion, and she’s competing again to defend her title in Puerto Rico later this month.

“If I had started doing body building in my 20s, I might be a coach now with endorsements, but it’s not like I’m going to try out for the Olympics,” Dr. Blaylock laughed. “I’m certainly not going to quit my day job, but it’s a lot of fun and I enjoy competing. Everyone should be able to do something for themselves that they enjoy.”

Posted in: Physicians Giving Back

Leave a Comment (0) →

Emergency Physicians: Georgia BCBS Policy Violates Federal Law

Emergency Physicians: Georgia BCBS Policy Violates Federal Law

WASHINGTON, DC – The American College of Emergency Physicians and its Georgia Chapter recently announced a policy that Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Georgia plans to implement in July, making subscribers pay for any emergency department visit that turns out not to be an emergency, violates the “prudent layperson” standard, which is codified in federal law, including the Affordable Care Act. It’s also the law in more than 30 states.

The “prudent layperson” standard requires that insurance coverage be based on a patient’s symptoms, not their final diagnosis. Anyone who seeks emergency care suffering from symptoms that appear to be an emergency, such as chest pain, cannot be denied coverage even if the final diagnosis does not turn out to be an emergency. It also prohibits insurance companies from requiring patients to get prior authorization before seeking emergency care.

“This new policy will mean that patients experiencing emergencies will not go to the ER because of fear of a bill, and could die as a result,” said Rebecca Parker, MD, FACEP, president of ACEP. “Health plans have a long history of not paying for emergency care.  Now, they are trying to roll over federal law that emergency physicians fought for to protect patients from this ‘profits first, people last’ behavior by insurers.”

In the new policy, final diagnoses that BCBS considers to be “non-urgent” would not be covered if the patient goes to the emergency department, leaving patients to decide whether they are experiencing an emergency. A 2013 study in JAMA found a nearly 90 percent overlap in symptoms between emergencies and non-emergencies.

“This policy threatens the safety of all Georgians,” said Matt Lyon, MD, FACEP, president of Georgia’s ACEP Chapter. “We treat patients every day with identical symptoms – some get to go home and some go to surgery. There is no way for patients to know which symptoms are life-threatening and which ones are not. Only a full medical work-up can determine that.”

Dr. Lyon adds that this action will be especially bad for Georgia’s rural population, where citizens are often limited in their options for medical care.

“If patients think they have the symptoms of a medical emergency, they should seek emergency care immediately,” said Dr. Parker. “The vast majority of emergency patients seek care appropriately, according to the CDC.  Patients cannot be expected to self-diagnose their medical conditions, which is why the prudent layperson standard must continue to be included in any replacement legislation of the Affordable Care Act.”

ACEP is the national medical specialty society representing emergency medicine. ACEP is committed to advancing emergency care through continuing education, research and public education. Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, ACEP has 53 chapters representing each state, as well as Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. A Government Services Chapter represents emergency physicians employed by military branches and other government agencies.

Posted in: Legal Watch

Leave a Comment (0) →
Page 2 of 3 123